吃瓜tv

Publications

Koch Mark, Lawrence Alan, , Roy Craig

Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (PACMPL) Vol 9, pp. 616-642 (2025)

Forbes Alistair, Lines Keith, , ,

Measurement: Sensors Vol 38 (2025)

, , , , Forbes Alistair, Lines Keith

Measurement: Sensors Vol 38 (2025)

, ,

Acta IMEKO Vol 12 (2023)

, , Chapman James, , McKinna James

Journal of Functional Programming Vol 31 (2021)

,

Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing XII (2021) (2021)

Professional Activities

Organiser

29/7/2024

Contributor

22/6/2022

Speaker

13/7/2021

Speaker

15/6/2021

Speaker

15/6/2021

Contributor

31/5/2017

Projects

McBride, Conor (Principal Investigator) Atkey, Bob (Co-investigator) Nordvall Forsberg, Fredrik (Co-investigator)

24-Jan-2020 - 23-Jan-2022

McBride, Conor (Principal Investigator) Atkey, Bob (Co-investigator) Nordvall Forsberg, Fredrik (Co-investigator)

24-Jan-2020 - 23-Jan-2022

Ghani, Neil (Principal Investigator) McBride, Conor (Co-investigator) Nordvall Forsberg, Fredrik (Co-investigator)

01-Jan-2019 - 30-Jan-2024

Ghani, Neil (Co-investigator) McBride, Conor (Principal Investigator) Nordvall Forsberg, Fredrik (Co-investigator)

01-Jan-2019 - 30-Jan-2023

McBride, Conor (Principal Investigator)

01-Jan-2016 - 31-Jan-2019

Ghani, Neil (Principal Investigator) McBride, Conor (Co-investigator)

"The cost of software failure is truly staggering. Well known
individual cases include the Mars Climate Orbiter failure
(拢80 million), Ariane Rocket disaster (拢350 million), Pentium
Chip Division failure (拢300 million), and more recently the heartbleed
bug (est. 拢400 million). There are many, many more examples. Even worse,
failures such as one in the Patriot Missile System and another
in the Therac-25 radiation system have cost lives. More generally, a
2008 study by the US government estimated that faulty
software costs the US economy 拢100 billion
annually.

There are many successful approaches to software verification
(testing, model checking etc). One approach is to find mathematical
proofs that guarantees of software correctness. However, the
complexity of modern software means that hand-written mathematical
proofs can be untrustworthy and this has led to a growing desire for
computer-checked proofs of software correctness.
Programming languages and interactive proof systems like Coq, Agda,
NuPRL and Idris have been developed based on a formal system called
Martin Type Theory. In these systems, we can not only write
programs, but we can also express properties of programs using types,
and write programs to express proofs that our programs are correct.
In this way, both large mathematical theorems such as the Four Colour
Theorem, and large software systems such as the CompCert C compiler
have been formally verified. However, in such large projects, the
issue of scalability arises: how can we use these systems to build large
libraries of verified software in an effective way?

This is related to the problem of reusability and modularity: a
component in a software system should be replaceable by another which
behaves the same way even though it may be constructed in a completely
different way. That is, we need an extensional equality which is
computationally well behaved (that is, we want to run programs using
this equality). Finding such an ty is a fundamental and
difficult problem which has remained unresolved for over 40 years.

But now it looks like we might have a solution! Fields medallist
Vladimir Voevodsky has come up with a completely different take on the
problem by thinking of equalities as paths such as those which occur
in one of the most abstract branches of mathematics, namely homotopy
theory, leading to Homotopy Type Theory (HoTT). In HoTT, two objects
are completely interchangeable if they behave the same way. However,
most presentations of HoTT involve axioms which lack computational
justification and, as a result, we do not have programming languages
or verification systems based upon HoTT. The goal of our project is
to fix that, thereby develop the first of a new breed of HoTT-based
programming languages and verification systems, and develop case
studies which demonstrate the power of HoTT to programmers and
those interested in formal verification.

We are an ideal team to undertake this research because i) we have
unique skills and ideas ranging from the foundations of HoTT to the
implementation and deployment of programming language and verification
tools; and ii) the active collaboration of the most important figures
in the area (including Voevodsky) as well as industrial participation
to ensure that we keep in mind our ultimate goal -- usable programming
language and verification tools."

01-Jan-2015 - 30-Jan-2019